Skip to content
Beaconby Winda
FactCorrosion and Damage Mechanisms · General and localized corrosion

What is microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC)?

·7 sources

Short answer

Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) is corrosion that microorganisms living in a biofilm on the metal start or speed up; API RP 571, third edition (2020), lists it as a damage mechanism, and AMPP's TM0212-2018 covers testing for it inside pipelines. It usually appears as localized pits where water stands still or flows slowly.

By , Editor·Researched and drafted by ·Checked by , Editor·Last checked ·Next review

When does MIC happen?

Microbes do not add a new kind of chemistry. A 2024 review describes MIC as microorganisms accelerating the two halves of ordinary corrosion: metal dissolving at the anode and the reaction at the cathode 5. API RP 571, third edition (2020), gives it its own section, 3.45, among the damage mechanisms of fixed equipment 1. It takes hold where four conditions meet:

  • Water that stands or moves slowly. MIC typically forms pits under biofilms and deposits, especially in stagnant water with no oxygen 7; inside pipelines it is more common in liquid lines than in gas lines 3.
  • Food and something to breathe. Produced oil and water supply carbon, while the steel and the seawater injected for secondary recovery supply iron and sulfate; temperatures of 15 to 35 °C in oil-handling facilities suit microbial growth 6.
  • Low oxygen near the metal. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) work without oxygen, and bacteria that use oxygen higher up in a line can consume it and so favour SRB below them 5.
  • Wet soil and failed coating, on the outside. External MIC needs nutrients, which bogs, landfills and refuse sites provide 3; in incident data it is most strongly linked to clay soils and tape coatings, though it has occurred with many soils and coatings 4.

Which microbes cause MIC?

No single species explains MIC. Corrosive biofilms are communities whose members work together, and one group can switch between several reactions 6. The groups below are the ones the sources name most often:

GroupOxygenWhat it does to steelClue in the field or laboratory
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB)Works without itTurns sulfate into sulfide and can draw electrons straight from the metal, which favours pitsSulfur or iron sulfide in the deposits; a rotten-egg smell in an excavation
Acid-producing bacteria (APB)Not specified; many are fermentersProduce acids under the biofilmAcid in the biofilm, low pH in the fluid
Sulfur-oxidizing and iron-oxidizing bacteriaNeed itConsume oxygen and make acids that speed metal oxidationFound where oxygen reaches the surface; can let SRB thrive beneath
Methanogens and other archaeaWork without itFound with sulfate reducers in corrosive offshore biofilmsSeen only with molecular methods such as quantitative PCR or gene sequencing

The table draws on the 2024 review, the PHMSA report of 2008 and the 2016 offshore study 5 3 6.

Field rates can far exceed laboratory ones. In 2014, a 10.9 mm steel pipe carrying oily seawater at 25 °C on an offshore facility in the Gulf of Mexico developed a pinhole leak after two years, about 5.45 mm/y; the highest rate the authors found reported for a single bacterial strain in the laboratory was 0.88 mm/y 6.

How common is MIC in pipeline incidents?

US incident data give a sense of scale. A 2019 presentation by a specialist at Canada's National Energy Board, now the Canada Energy Regulator, broke down incidents on US hazardous liquid pipelines reported to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) from 2010 to early 2019 4:

Incident causeIncidentsWith MICShare with MIC
Internal corrosion43919244%
External corrosion2783814%
All causes3,5492306.5%

Counts are from the presentation; the shares for internal and external corrosion are calculated from them 4. For 2002 to 2009, the same source puts MIC at 4.8 percent of all hazardous liquid incidents, and it cautions that MIC can go unrecognized or unreported 4. The presenter's views were stated not to be the board's 4.

How is MIC found?

For the inside of pipelines, AMPP keeps a dedicated test method, NACE TM0212-2018, Detection, Testing, and Evaluation of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion on Internal Surfaces of Pipelines 2. The guiding rule, quoted from NACE TM0106-2016 for buried pipe, is that MIC is concluded from the weight of circumstantial evidence rather than from one test 4.

Inside a line, the biofilm itself is the best sample. Its decay products point to the bacteria at work: sulfur suggests SRB, and acid or low pH suggests APB 3. Research laboratories add scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive spectroscopy and microsensors that read pH, hydrogen sulfide and oxygen at different depths of a biofilm 5. DNA methods, such as quantitative PCR and high-throughput sequencing, show which microbes are present in a biofilm 6.

Outside a buried line, quick kits and laboratory tests check soil samples for bacterial activity 3. Investigators also gather coating type and condition, soil and water table data, oxygen conditions at pipe depth, above-ground coating surveys and in-line inspection results 4.

How is MIC controlled?

Inside pipelines, the PHMSA report lists biocides injected into the flow, cleaning pigs that remove deposits, and, for gas lines, drying the gas and removing places where liquid can collect 3. The 2024 review adds protective and antibacterial coatings, and notes that bacteria can become resistant after long use of the same chemical treatment 5.

On the outside, cathodic protection needs a stricter target where MIC is involved: about -950 mV against a copper/copper sulfate electrode, or a 300 mV or greater shift, in place of the usual -850 mV or 100 mV shift 3.

Is MIC the same as pitting corrosion?

No. Pitting is a form, what the damage looks like; MIC is a cause, and it usually leaves pits under biofilms and deposits 7. Many pits have nothing to do with microbes: stainless steel pits in chloride water with an oxidizer present, no biofilm needed 7. Telling the two apart is the point of the evidence-based diagnosis above. See pitting corrosion and what is corrosion?.

Common questions

Is MIC the same as pitting corrosion?
No. Pitting describes what the damage looks like; MIC describes one cause of it. MIC usually produces pits, but stainless steel in chloride water can pit with no microbes involved.
Does finding bacteria prove MIC?
Not on its own. NACE TM0106-2016, as a Canadian regulator's specialist noted in 2019, treats MIC as a conclusion drawn from the weight of circumstantial evidence, so microbe tests are read together with deposits, damage shape and operating history.
Can cathodic protection stop MIC on buried pipe?
It can help, with a stricter target. A 2008 PHMSA report recommends about -950 mV against a copper/copper sulfate electrode when MIC is suspected, rather than the usual -850 mV.

Beacon explains these concepts in its own words for education. It does not reproduce or replace the standards cited. Engineering decisions need the current edition of the standard and a qualified engineer.

Sources

  1. 1.API RP 571, Damage Mechanisms Affecting Fixed Equipment in the Refining Industry, Third Edition, March 2020 (edition and section numbers as listed in the API 570 Exam Publications Effectivity Sheet for February and June 2027) · American Petroleum Institute
  2. 2.Standards and Reports for Pipeline Protection, 2022 (lists NACE TM0212-2018, Detection, Testing, and Evaluation of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion on Internal Surfaces of Pipelines) · AMPP (Materials Performance Pipeline Supplement) ·
  3. 3.Pipeline Corrosion: Final Report, Integrity Management Program, Delivery Order DTRS56-02-D-70036, November 2008 · US Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
  4. 4.Been, A Regulator's View on Approaches to MIC Threat and Failure Assessment, Forum on Assessment of MIC Threats and Failures, 7 February 2019 · National Energy Board of Canada (presentation hosted by the University of Calgary) ·
  5. 5.The Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion and Protection of Pipelines: A Detailed Review, Materials, 2024 · Materials (MDPI), via PubMed Central ·
  6. 6.Vigneron et al., Complementary Microorganisms in Highly Corrosive Biofilms from an Offshore Oil Production Facility, 2016 · Applied and Environmental Microbiology, via PubMed Central ·
  7. 7.Forms of Corrosion · NASA Kennedy Space Center Corrosion Technology Laboratory